|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 Media Programming I | | By: Crick | Published: 09/05/2000 | | |  |
|
Two weeks ago, the nation sat paralytically in front of their televisions
and watched the finale of the series, Survivor. For those of you who know
what the show was all about, I suggest you think again.
|
On the surface, it
showed people eating rats, and that's not something you see everyday. On
the surface it was all about "surviving" long enough on a desert island to
win the prize. A "Lord of the Flies" in real time, streaming video...
almost. The show ended with some guy who apparently no one liked winning
the grand prize of that currently mythical amount of a MILLION dollars.
Wow... a MILLION. |
|
His face was on page 1 of the New York Daily News the
next day. I thought page 1 of any newspaper is supposed to be dedicated to
real news, but obviously I must be mistaken. Anyone who buys that bogus rag
should cancel their subscription just on principle alone. They have
insulted your intelligence with that headline, just as they did by
broadcasting the show.
Some might think that I'm being too hard on the show, criticizing it unfairly
because, after all, it was just a game - a harmless form of entertainment
for the millions of people who have nothing better to do with their time.
Maybe that's true, but before you tune out, reach into your bag of tricks
and pull out the pattern indicator. It's right there in your bag of tricks
next to your tv remote control, which is right next to your VCR remote
control, which is right next to your cable tv remote control. This device,
however, lets you string together various elements that seem unrelated to
form a clearer picture on how we're being "programmed" by remote control
(just think of what "remote control" really means). Point your device at
several of the latest game show crazes, just to name a few, and let's see
what we get:
1) Survivor
2) Greed
3) Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?
4) Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire?
5) Big Brother
Any bells going off in our heads? If not, push the red button on your
Pattern Indicator device (the button that says, "Warning") and see what
happens. All our illusions disappear. The worst of it rears an ugly head,
and the best of it makes us queasy. What a wonderful device!
The first pattern that we notice is that none of the "programs" are very
interesting. In fact, they're quite inane. Numbers 1 and 5 are various
forms of voyeuristic fetish, stemming from the fact that we've been told
that other people's lives are infinitely more interesting than our own.
And through years of advertising bombardment telling us that it's so, we
tend to believe that someone eating rats is more interesting than anything
else you could be doing at that moment. And although these shows claim to
be more real than other shows, they nevertheless fragment our notions of
reality. Does anyone we know eat rats? And what's the likelihood of being
deserted on an island? Actually, if they wanted to keep it closer to
reality, they could have put those poor people in a nuclear bomb shelter for
several months, but that would be coming too close for comfort, wouldn't it?
Numbers 2, 3, and 4 are various forms of dream fulfillment, becoming
immensely rich in the span of a 60-minute extravaganza. Watching another
person win lots of money transfers the joy to a happy audience. This is
what they think will happen. Does it? How do you feel after? Are you
fulfilled? No matter, as long as you sat through their advertising blitzes
between moments of fleeting fantasy. Anyway, it keeps us busy dreaming what
new products we would buy with our newly found wealth.
The second pattern we notice is that we are told, in an indirect way, that
it's okay to do almost anything for money, as long as the amount is
sufficient. With a title like "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?", people are
answering, "ME!!!..." The show itself is rather innocuous. Winning is
based on one's knowledge. But it's not the content of the show that really
matters. What's really important is the slogan, "Who wants to be filthy
rich by answering a few questions?" In the instant wealth, lottery mania,
lawsuit riddled land we live in, it seems only right that people should
become millionaires for knowing how many colors there are on the Costa Rican
flag. And just as it's easy to become a millionaire by luck, you can also do
it by marriage. Of course the producers of that show were red-faced when
their darling man turned out to be a sociopath, but what were they
expecting? The "program" Greed, is by far the worst of them all, though.
Look no further than the title for the glorification of money and the
programming of our minds to believe that, by any means necessary (even
giving someone the royal screw), the pursuit of wealth is our highest aim.
It seems like now it's okay to double-cross our friends and coworkers, as
long as the stakes are high enough. It's also okay, because everyone is
watching them do it, and no one is really that appalled by it. Since
millions of people are watching it, it must be popular, and since it's
popular, it must be okay.
But the third pattern that we notice is, by far, the most insidious and dark
of them all. Point your indicator device at numbers 1 and 5, and push the
red button again. Here's what we see: driving most deeply into the
consciousness of viewers is the underlying metaphor of choosing who should
"survive", and who should be "removed". Again, this concept seems okay
because millions of people seemingly think it's okay. On one level it seems
harmless. People say, "It's only a show... relax." No folks, it's more
than a show. It's a PROGRAM. Don't forget that word. Let's turn our
attention to Big Brother for a moment. First of all... what a name. Did we
think they could make it sound so benign in our wildest dreams? Considering
the fact that, everyday of our lives, our privacy is being eroded by the
false god of convenience, we'd be a little hesitant to be so agreeable to
the idea. But remember, it's just a harmless "game" show, right? I
remember when game shows asked people to work to solve linguistic riddles or
trivia questions. Now it's, "be the last one in the house (i.e. Bomb
Shelter, Community, etc) and a million dollars is ours." At a time when
population reduction is on the tables of all major world governments, what
better way to make us agreeable to such notions than through a "harmless"
game show? It seems like I'm stretching the point, but if we don't think
that population reduction is one of the proposed solutions to the runaway
environmental problems we are facing in the coming generation, then we are
seriously mistaken. So now we've trivialized the removal of individuals
from society because the acquisition of wealth cannot be spread between the
sad lot of castaways. Misfits are produced, and they are simply made to
disappear. They are metaphorically wiped away, never to be thought of
again, as if they were executed ritualistically in some pagan lottery of
sacrifice. The power of suggestion is a great enemy, and if we're not
conscious of how it works, it becomes a great invisible enemy, too. Just a
few thoughts to consider.
More to come in Part II ...
Why not join the rest of us on the inside and get all of Goofball.com? |  | |  | Related Links This Old Whore House
Country
Did you know ...
Tips on love by kids age 5-10.
Factiods You Cannot Live Without
Dead German found sitting at home, five years later
Shock Video Used to Scare Off Illegals
How are your cricket spitting skills?
Angry Passengers Burn Train Over Delay
Hugh Grant
WOW, I Love The 'Today Show'!
Tim Allen
George Carlin
How to speak about women and be politically correct
Tyson in Isolation Cell After Hurling TV
Teletubbies' TV boob
Transvestite boxer to show Argentina swing or two
Man Spends 142 days Buried Alive
Naked guy hacks up churchgoers
The King's Auction Has Princely Bids
|
More Rants...
| | |
|
|
ARTICLE FORUM LIST |
|
You must register to participate in this discussion.
|
  |
blah
(0 replies)
started by
Cantrell79
(09.09.2000 1:04:07 AM EST)
Well, as ignorant and compliant as some may seem, I do agree with you, Crick.
-Cantrell79
|
  |
blah
(0 replies)
started by
Cantrell79
(09.09.2000 1:03:25 AM EST)
Well, as ignorant and compliant as some may seem, I do agree with you, Crick.
-Cantrell79
|
  |
may....
(0 replies)
started by
bat
(09.08.2000 8:32:30 AM EST)
the strongest survive & the meek shall not inherit the earth.... Cuz they're pussies!Love your country,Question your government.
|
  |
get a life
(0 replies)
started by
spoiler
(09.07.2000 10:03:02 AM EST)
Is this really how you spend your time? Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, cuz you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
|
  |
again...
(0 replies)
started by
crick
(09.06.2000 7:15:13 PM EST)
Spoiler...
I don't know why I continue to carry on this pointless (or is it?) conversation, but let me have just one more chance.
What I said in part 1 (yes, there's another coming) of my rant has almost nothing to do with the quality of shows. But I guess you need to be bonked over the head with an idea if you're gonna get the point. Sorry, my fault. Analyzing a "program" according to its psycho-social ramifications is a lot different than just saying, "gee... that sucks." And if you're gonna say that it isn't worth the debate, then fine. Just tell me something that is worth the debate... if there is anything worthy of a one, anyway. I'm really not sure that there is one (no truth out there... only opinion), but it's better than wrapping oneself up in the ignorance that pervades.
|
  |
LMAO
(0 replies)
started by
spoiler
(09.06.2000 4:47:22 PM EST)
apparently I failed in making that last response a bit shorter, oh well, that's funnyDo not meddle in the affairs of dragons, cuz you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
|
  |
round 2
(0 replies)
started by
spoiler
(09.06.2000 4:46:15 PM EST)
This one I'll make a bit shorter, I type fast I think fast, short comments can me made long, I sometimes choose to do so as well. After considering that, touche. But to devote the kind of time you spent on that compared to my 10 seconds of response, there's really no comparison. The subject of quality tv shows is not worth the debate, as you can find something wrong with all programming, tv never has been much of an educational tool, take care.Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, cuz you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
|
  |
Ha Ha
(0 replies)
started by
crick
(09.06.2000 7:02:52 AM EST)
hey spoiler...
I agree with what you said about letting people dig their own graves, but you need to increase your attention span a bit more. What YOU think is irrelevent might just be a little more than that. Anyway, I didn't watch any of those programs, either, but I guess I didn't make that clear enough. By the way, I also thought it was funny that you said you couldn't waste your time reading, but you did manage to write a long enough comment. Guess I got to you... guess you felt compelled to waste your time criticizing ME. Anyway, your pithy quote about dragons is a laugher. Sorry, maybe you'd like to be one of the cowering "sheeople", but I choose differently. I was just wondering, too, how you waste YOUR time. Read any good books lately??? It's also funny that you think a few paragraphs worth of thought is "a lot of talking." Perhaps stringing a few coherent ideas together constitutes a great effort for you. Not for me.
|
  |
Excellent!
(0 replies)
started by
RedNeckedTulsan
(09.05.2000 5:10:15 PM EST)
Crick i see what you have seen in sport too. The games mutate to cater for teh ever increasing attention span of viewers. NFL never runs for more tha a few seconds and we have a break for a commercial. We are programmed to think this is a good thing. Hell one guy here even commented that he could not read read your whole rant! Attention wandered i bet. There is a famous somebody(i wish i could remember whom) that claims that you can tell a nations ideals and goals by looking at their advertisements. I believe that is true and very very scary.
|
Goofball.com is not responsible for any content which individual users post. Goofball.com reserves the right to delete any content which it deems objectionable or in violation of any law or regulation.
|
|
| Rate This!
|
 |
|
 |
| Section Features
|
 |
|
 |
| One Year Ago
|
 |
Back Up, Back Up, Back Up
How many times have you been told to back up your hard drive, your photos, your mp3s ... your porn? I spend enough time online each day that I should know better, but noooooo. Do I heed this advice? Of course not. Why? Because it would never happen to me. Until about six months ago.
11.05.2006
Problems Accessing Goofball?
We have been getting scattered reports from Goofballers telling us they have not been able to access the site. In order for us to troubleshoot this problem effectively we need to know a few things ...
10.26.2006
Comments Made In 1955 (and I Remember Them All!)
Comments made in the year 1955 ...
10.15.2006
|
 |
|
 |
| Two Years Ago
|
 |
A Goofball Wedding
Many people have been brought togther by Goofball.com ...
05.09.2006
Text Messaging from your Computer
Ocassionally I need to get a message to a friend or family member. It's not urgent, but just a quick note and I don't actually want to talk to them, just send them a quick text message ...
02.02.2006
New York City Rules
Now that the holiday season has set upon us with such menace, many of you will be making your respective pilgrimages to New York ...
12.21.2005
Editor's Note:The author of this rant is a friend of Goofball and has one of the most legit blogs on the net.
How Not to Get a Job
I have been hiring people for some time now, but this was a new one for me ...
08.09.2005
|
 |
|
 |
| Lookie Here!
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Goofball Facts |
 |
| |
|
According to U.S. laws, a beer commercial can never show a person actually drinking beer.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|